Archive | Neuroeconomics RSS feed for this section

Neuro-Hype

Neuro-Hype

A post by Josh Wright on the Truth on the Market blog, Rubenstein on Behavioral Economics, called my attention to a year-old paper by Ariel Rubinstein of the school of Economics at Tel Aviv University and the Department of Economics at New York University. Discussion of “BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS” takes issue with the emerging field of [...]

Continue Reading...

Voodoo Neuroeconomics

Voodoo Neuroeconomics

In neuromarketing, it’s not uncommon to see a big leap from actual research data to a questionable business conclusion. It turns out that neuroeconomics research can be similarly used. You can be the judge of whether BrandMillion.com is one of these wacky and unsupportable leaps or the Next Big Thing. The firm’s press release, BrandMillion™ [...]

Continue Reading...

Deal or No Deal

Deal or No Deal

[photopress:deal_or_no_deal.jpg,thumb,alignleft]The wildly popular television game show, Deal or No Deal, is a televised neuroeconomics experiment (or would be if you could scan the brains of the participants as they played): each week, contestants choose to accept a fixed amount of money, or keep playing with the possibility of a still-higher payoff. In each round of [...]

Continue Reading...

Avoiding Fairness Dissonance

Avoiding Fairness Dissonance

Most of us attempt to treat each other fairly, and react negatively if we feel we are treated unfairly. We may even react negatively if we see someone else being treated in an unfair manner. Research shows that this sense of fairness isn’t something we learn in school or from our parents (though undoubtedly those [...]

Continue Reading...

Pricing, Ego, and Emotion

Pricing, Ego, and Emotion

Neuromarketing and Pricing. Why do people sometimes set prices that are too high, and then stubbornly stick with them despite evidence from the marketplace that the price is indeed wrong? Neuroeconomics research tells us that financial decisions are often evaluated in a way that lets our emotions overrule rational financial analysis, and setting prices turns [...]

Continue Reading...

Neuroeconomics Loses to Crackberry

Neuroeconomics Loses to Crackberry

Neuroeconomics finished a respectable runner-up in the 2006 Word of the Year contest run by staffers at Webster’s New World College Dictionary. Crackberry, a term that reflects the addicitive nature of PDA-based messaging and e-mail, is used to refer to both the PDAs and their users. The press release listed two other runner-up words: netroots [...]

Continue Reading...

Free Money? Just Say No!

Free Money?  Just Say No!

I’m still catching up on the reading I missed during my extended trip (and posting hiatus) a few weeks ago, and one of the more interesting things I’ve run across is an article in the UK’s Times Online, Why say no to free money? It’s neuro-economics, stupid. The article describes an unusual variation on the [...]

Continue Reading...

Cruise Marketing and Neuroeconomics

Cruise Marketing and Neuroeconomics

[photopress:cruise_ship.jpg,thumb,alignleft]One of the most successful sectors in the travel industry has been cruising. Megalines like Carnival and others are building ever-bigger ships to handle the increased traffic and offer more amenities. There’s no doubt that a good part of the success of the cruise industry is due to offering a product that people want: a [...]

Continue Reading...

Warranties, Neuromarketing, and Neuroeconomics

Warranties, Neuromarketing, and Neuroeconomics

There’s a neuromarketing lesson in extended warranties. If you have purchased any kind of electronic product in the last few years, you were almost certainly offered an opportunity to extend the product’s warranty. Despite the fact that these are rarely great deals, many people purchase them. Often, the cost of the warranty is a significant [...]

Continue Reading...

Neuroeconomics, Asymmetric Paternalism, and Marketing

Neuroeconomics, Asymmetric Paternalism, and Marketing

How can neuroscience inform marketing? One example comes from the increasingly hot field of neuroeconomics: a practice called asymmetric paternalism. In New Yorker writer John Cassidy’s superb neuroeconomics article, Mind Games: What neuroscience tells us about money and the brain, the practice is described as “a new political philosophy based on the idea of saving [...]

Continue Reading...