Emmy Awards Match Neuromarketing Study
The recent Creative Arts Emmy Award result had an interesting neuromarketing tie-in: Super Bowl commercials found to be emotionally engaging using EEG and biometric measures fared unusually well in the Emmy award competition:
Earlier this year, Sands Research Inc., a leading provider of neuromarketing research studies, completed an extensive study into all 72 television commercials aired during NBC`s 2009 Super Bowl XLIII broadcast. Each of the TV spots were ranked by the Company`s Neuro-Engagement Factor (NEF) scoring system which is based upon measuring EEG (brain wave) activity from viewers and Sands Research`s proprietary software and algorithms that measures the viewer`s attention levels.
Three out of the top five commercials identified from that Super Bowl study were nominated for the coveted Academy of Television Arts and Sciences` Creative Arts Emmy Award. This past weekend, top ranked Coca-Cola`s “Heist” from Wieden + Kennedy, won the 2009 Emmy Award for outstanding commercial at the Creative Arts Emmy Awards. [From Reuters Press Release – Sands Research 2009 Super Bowl Neuromarketing Study Matches Creative Arts Emmy Awards.]
Is this coincidence? Perhaps not… According to Sands, “a good ad will always have a large spike in brain activity within the first 800 milliseconds of the ad and sustain a high plateau across the length of the commercial.” It seems likely that many ads found to be engaging this way would also capture the attention of judges.
Of course, that doesn’t mean the ad will actually sell product. An ad can entertain effectively while not leading to sales or even improving brand recall. Nevertheless, such studies should be able to weed out the duds – ads that are supposed to be entertaining and engaging but miss that mark.
Sands Research rankings of all 2009 Super Bowl ads can be found here.
Roger – To quote your February 1, 2009 posting “Who will win the neuromarketing Super Bowl?”:
“I do expect that sooner or later we’ll see some validated research that ties ad neuromarketing rankings to results in the marketplace. Let the game(s) begin!”
We are now starting to see validated research be released that confirms neuromarketing’s value for the advertising community (and I emphasize validated research – not some of these CEO puff piece articles).
The analysis Sands Research performed with Ameritest and released in the August issue of Quirk’s, demonstrates the added value of combined copytesting and neuromarketing market research. (http://www.sandsresearch.com/AT_SRI_Quirk.aspx)
Your July 27th post regarding the book “Brand Immortality” by Pringle and Field, specifically the IPA dataBANK research they collected that demonstrated “Campaigns with purely emotional content performed about twice as well”. However, “The authors note that while an emotional marketing campaign may be more effective, creating ads that engage consumer emotions isn’t easy.” And you concluded “Emotion-based ads may be more difficult to create, but the stats say it’s worth the effort.”
And our Super Bowl results which match the Emmy Award, as you say, “such studies should be able to weed out the duds”.
After twenty plus years of working in and with the cognitive neuroscience research community, Steve Sands and I realize it is not one big “Aha” moment. Advancement in understanding brain function and emotions are lots of small “Aha” moments.
With the acceptance of neuromarketing as an adjunct to standard market research methodologies by advertisers, the financial rewards will bring even more talented cognitive neuroscience researchers into the field and I believe that sooner not later, we will see more exciting, validated research advancing our knowledge of why we buy.
Thanks for being a key central point for the field.
CEO / Sands Research Inc.