Consumer Neuroscience: Neuromarketing Rebranded?

No, I’m not rebranding my blog Neuromarketing. But, with my broad focus on an all-encompassing definition of neuromarketing, I may be part of what some perceive as a problem – a too-inclusive use of the term. The biggest firm in the neuromarketing space, Nielsen’s NeuroFocus unit, is trying to sharpen the distinction between research approaches that use direct brain activity measurements (NeuroFocus uses EEG) and those that use techniques like biometrics, facial coding, and behavior metrics.

According to Caroline Winnett, Chief Marketing Officer and co-founder of NeuroFocus, the problem with the term “neuromarketing” isn’t just the “neuro” part. Providers like her firm go beyond purely marketing topics and engage in product testing, brand development, technology development, and R&D. Their proposed term, “consumer neuroscience,” would both emphasize the direct measurement of brain activity and avoid the limits imposed by a marketing-only focus.

One question that comes to mind is whether “consumer” might make B2B marketers feel excluded, but at the moment virtually all neuromarketing activity is consumer-focused.

I’m not planning on rebranding the blog, as I prefer a broadly inclusive definition of neuromarketing. Many of the strategies I discuss here and in my book Brainfluence are based on research using techniques other than EEG and fMRI. In a later post, I’ll get into this in more depth and maybe even update my own neuromarketing definition. That definition dates back to 2006, and both the industry and my own thinking have evolved since then.

What do you think? Does consumer neuroscience work for the industry?

email

This post was written by:

— who has written 985 posts on Neuromarketing.

Roger Dooley writes and speaks about marketing, and in particular the use of neuroscience and behavioral research to make advertising, marketing, and products better. He is the primary author at Neuromarketing, and founder of Dooley Direct LLC, a marketing consultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

Contact the author

Brainfluence: 100 Ways to Persuade and Convince Consumers with Neuromarketing Get 100 amazing brain-based marketing strategies! Brainfluence is recommended for any size business, even startups and nonprofits!
Guy KawasakiRead this book to learn even more ways to change people's hearts, minds, and actions.   — Guy Kawasaki, author of Enchantment and former chief evangelist of Apple
Brainfluence Info

{

7 responses to "Consumer Neuroscience: Neuromarketing Rebranded?" — Your Turn

}

dale 10. August 2012 at 8:13 am

Neuromarketing, public relations and propaganda seem to have a lot in common. Hopefully as we evolve we will move past the roles of consumers and marketeers, where much of marketing and consumerism creates competition and seperation, rather, using some of that same neurological realestate to develope a greater sense of connection and compassion as a platform to take humanity to the next level of being.

Reply

Giancarlo Mirmillo 13. August 2012 at 3:46 am

consumer neuroscience is a term that is used for some time http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_neuroscience.
I always thought that there should be difference between the results of neuroscience research and the use of neuroscience techniques (EEG, fMRI, Heg …..) outside the laboratories.
With a strong convergence with the approach of Roger, at aicon.me we are, perhaps, the first company that offers solutions based on neuroscience research B2B
We create a space through which professionals engaged in neuroscience research and social research can interact and develop new visions for understanding people, social dynamics and cultures, not just consumers.
We think that this is more important than renaming.

Reply

social networking 13. August 2012 at 8:03 am

I had always been excited about the neurobiological basis of personality types. This post will be followed by more on the neural basis of personality.
Thanks for sharing this.

Reply

Ron Wright
Twitter: Sands_Research
13. August 2012 at 11:13 am

Roger -

Caroline is correct. There is tremendous confusion for the individual that is trying to navigate the various services offered that all fall under the term “neuromarketing”. Sands Research also moved to using the term consumer neuroscience in the past couple years due to our intensive work in shopper insight, new product development and testing (R&D) besides the TVCMs and print / packaging work.

The ARF NeuroStandards Study helped clarify the confusion a little by only focusing on vendors that performed some form of biological measurement as compared to vendors offering neuromarketing consulting services. But they failed to provide a strong distinction between instantaneous direct brain response measurements, i.e. EEG and fMRI, and older periphery measurements like galvanic skin response (sweat) and heart rate. Whether a shinny new wrist band or fancy EKG vest, the bottom line is that these are late measures, difficult to sink with the media, require a large emotional response and little has changed in this area of biometrics since the 1970s. Measurements that few academic neuroscience researchers utilize. More cardiology related for monitoring heart function not brain response.

Hope this helps.
Ron Wright
CEO
Sands Research Inc.
http://www.sandsresearch.com

Reply

Carla Nagel, Director Neuromarketing Science and Business Association
Twitter: La_Nagel
15. August 2012 at 2:00 pm

I don’t want to bring up a discussion about marketing, but in my opinion it is about better understanding of the market, improve your ideas, services and products accordingly and communicate this to the right people.

If we agree on this marketing definition, then product testing, packaging and branding is part of marketing, isn’t it?

I agree on you with a broadly inclusive definition of Neuromarketing, whether we measure direct from the brain or not, it is all about “the idea” that our unconscious is in charge of a lot product preferences and decisions.

By the way: there is some great B2B research coming up next year.

Reply

Laura Grace
Twitter: lauragrace42
6. September 2012 at 12:58 pm

What about commercial neuroscience? I know it sounds very…well…commercial, but that seems to be where we are going with this. I also like the existing blanket term “decision science.”

Reply

Pedro Camargo 9. September 2012 at 8:15 am

Dear Roger and colleagues, in my opinion there is a clear difference between “neuromarketing” and “consumer neuroscience”. First of all “neuromarketing” is just a research method, a little part of marketing studies. “Neuromarketing research” is focused on consumer behavior for companies that has profitable goals ( profitable interests in the results). From companies for companies and “consumer neuroscience” must be apply just for that research made in universities that has interests only in a cientific discovery ( no profitable interests on the results). From University for government and citizens Just to understand how and why consumer choose and buy products. This kind of research is academic and adressed to understand consumption and posible anomaly. And for the others kinds of researches “those that use techniques like biometrics, facial coding, and behavior metrics.” including behavioral endocrinology and behavioral genetics I created “Biology of Consumer Behavior” in portuguese “Biologia do Comportamento do Consumidor.” This denomination can hold all kind of biology research.

Reply

Leave a Reply